The first article that we hear about is a poet, about Andy Carrington. In the text Andy talks about the views on tattoos now a days. He says that the view has changed among the last years. People used to have symbols / religious tattoos, while other people used to indicate their life, ex: background criminal history. Where today people have lots of reasons to get a tattoo. Some people get’s a tattoo because of the look, other because of the culture or meaning by it, even someone get’s a tattoo because of the pain. The psychologists Anderson and Samson say that tattoos are for some people indication of their individual’s life problems. Maybe they get it because of their own meaning about it, and likes how it looks. But if you ask, Anderson and Samson they say that it’s a reach for help. Also there is a connection about people with many tattoos for the art part of it, and for people with many tattoos as a reach for help.
The next article called ‘’Tattoos were once a sign of rebellion – now they are evidence of craven conformity to cultural norms’’
Here we hear about Brendan O’Neill, who just has forbidden people to get tattoos if their was working for the government. “If they want to have tattoos, they should quit working for the city and go to the private sector” This comment comes from Brendan O’Neill after a employee had scared some kids, because of his many tattoos. Brendan got so angry when he heard this, that he forbidden tattoos to some people. (As I mention in the beginning)
Det er gratis at oprette en konto