1 / 25 sider - klik for at bladre

SRP - 9/11

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

SRP - 9/11 er en projektopgave-opgave fra 2019 til 3.g el. lign, afleveret til karakteren 4. Fylder 25 sider (9.812 ord, ca. 43 min. læsning) og blev publiceret 6. oktober 2020.

Opgaven er en SRP omkring emnet 9/11. Omkring selve begivenheden og hvad der skete i USA på daværende tidspunkt. Fagene der blev brugt er Engelsk og Historie.

Navn Kristian Ib Jensen Fag: Historie A Vejleder: Jesper Pilgaard Buchgraitz (JB) Fag: Engelsk A Vejleder: Mette Grønkjær Jensen Bolko (MG) Klasse 3d

9/11

Redegør kort for angrebet p? USA den 11. september 2001. Kom herunder ind p? baggrunden for angrebet. Analyser nedenst?ende taler af George Bush (2001), Rudy Giuliani (2001) og Donald Trump (2018) med særligt fokus p? brugen af retoriske virkemidler. Sammenlign de tre taler og de benyttede retoriske virkemidler. Diskuter USA’s reaktion p? angrebene og vurder, hvordan USA og amerikanere generelt er blevet p?virket af terrorisme. Diskuter endvidere hvilken af de tre præsidenter, der er den bedste taler og hvorfor. Inddrag artikel fra dr.dk (Dines Boertmann: Modstand mod USA’s anti-terror lov) samt mindst yderligere ?n historisk kilde i din besvarelse.

Bush’s tale: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/21/september11.usa13 Giuliani’s tale: https://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/01/nyregion/full-text-giuliani-addresses-united-

nations.html

Trump’s tale: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/11/trumps-fulls-remarks9-11-anniversary815138

Opgavens omfang:15-20 side

1

SRP Kristian Ib Jensen

Holstebro Gymnasium og HF

3D EN/HI

19-12-2018 Side 2 af 25

Abstract

In this assignment it shows a review of what happened at 9/11 and why the attack happened, and what the reasons for the attack was. It also contains an analysis of three speeches from former president George W. Bush, former Mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani and the present president Donald Trump. The analysis also contains a comparison of the three speeches and the use of rhetorical instruments in the speeches. This assignment also contains a discussion of the reactions from USA on the attack on America that day. It also contains a discussion on the reactions from the president, the mayor and the present president. In the discussion there is also a discussion of how the Americans and USA is affected of terrorism today. In the end it includes a discussion of who of the three speakers are best, and which is the best speech. I have made this assignment in different chapters and in different sections. In the assignment I have chosen to make an introduction, which includes knowledge of the definition of terrorism. It also includes different kinds of terrorism. I have in the review, the analysis and the discussion, been writing a lot about USA and their influence on the attacks. I have concluded in this assignment that a horrible terrorattack happened in USA. I have also concluded that the three speakers are good at using rhetorical instruments. In the end I have concluded that the Americans reacted sadly on the attack and that USA is still affected of terror-attacks. I have at last concluded that the best speaker is George W. Bush.

Få adgang til denne og 100.000+ andre opgaver i PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Lignende opgaver