Nedenstående tekstuddrag er fra artiklen ”Walking while black: Michael Brown, black men and white police officers”.
Tag stilling til, hvorfor der er anvendt ing-form eller udvidet tid i nedenstående tekststykke. Brug relevant grammatisk/faglig terminologi.
During my teen and young adult years, I recall being (“recall” requires a relatively close verb to be in ing-form therefore being) pulled over for having (“for” is a preposition and prepositions cannot be followed by a verb in infinitive. Therefore, it has to be in ing-form) a non-working license plate light, despite the fact that it was shining brightly. I was pulled over for having a license plate partially obstructed by snow while it was snowing(In this case “was snowing” is in continuous form, this we can determine because there is a focus on a specific time). I was stopped for having a small crack in my windshield, as if the officer could see that from 50 yards away.
Far too often after their bogus reasons (sometimes they gave none at all), the officers would ask the same questions. Where was I coming from? Where was I going? What was I doing (yet again continuous form has been used as “what was I doing” refers to a specific action spanning over a period of time) in the area?
Det er gratis at oprette en konto