1 / 2 sider - klik for at bladre

Analyse af Alexander Betts' TED talk om Brexit

  • Engelsk
  • 1.g el. lign.
  • Afleveret til 4
  • 2 sider PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Analyse af Alexander Betts' TED talk om Brexit er en engelsk-opgave til 1.g el. lign., afleveret til karakteren 4. Fylder 2 sider (759 ord, ca. 3 min. læsning) og blev publiceret 21. juni 2019.

Denne opgave analyserer Alexander Betts' TED talk om Brexit fra 2016. Den fokuserer på hans retoriske virkemidler, herunder brugen af pathos, logos og ethos, for at overbevise et højtuddannet publikum. Opgaven diskuterer også Betts' negative syn på Brexit og hans argumenter for dette.

Redaktørens vurdering
10 Fortrinlig
Solid analyse af Alexander Betts' TED talk om Brexit, med fokus på retoriske virkemidler. Velfunderet og struktureret.
Struktur
10
Faglig dybde
10
Kilder
10
Fuldstændighed
10
  • alexander betts
  • brexit
  • ethos
  • eu
  • logos
  • pathos
  • retorik
  • storbritannien
  • ted talk

Alexander Betts - “Why Brexit happened and what to do next

On the 23rd of Juni 2016, a referendum in the United Kingdom was held. The referendum should decide if the UK should remain a member of, or leave the European Union. 51,89% of the 33.551.893 valid votes, was in favor of leaving the Union. Former Prime-minister David Cameron announced his resignation, the day after the referendum and left office the 13th of July.

Alexander Betts is a British social scientist, and talked in TEDSummit back in 2016. He talked about what Brexit represented for the world, what people can do about it, and how people should respond to it.

Alexander Betts is a professor of Forced Migration and International Affair at Oxford University and assist in politics and economics of refugee assistance. He has written over 50 articles, book chapters and working papers that has been published in many Journals of Refugees. His language can be hard to understand due to the complicated vocabulary he uses, and also complicated words such as “xenophobia”, “disillusionment with the political establishment” and “the ugly face of exclusionary and antagonistic globalization.”. Even though his language can be hard to understand, he does a very good job at explaining and arguing his point, which makes the talk show easier to understand as his opinions are clearly described.

Få adgang til denne og 100.000+ andre opgaver i PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Du har også set på

Lignende opgaver