1 / 2 sider - klik for at bladre

Analyse af 'Why Tattoos make my flesh crawl'

  • Engelsk
  • 1.g el. lign.
  • Afleveret til 10
  • 2 sider PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Analyse af 'Why Tattoos make my flesh crawl' er en engelsk-opgave til 1.g el. lign., afleveret til karakteren 10. Fylder 2 sider (613 ord, ca. 3 min. læsning) og blev 13. juli 2026.

Denne opgave analyserer Neil Davenports artikel 'Why Tattoos make my flesh crawl', publiceret i 'Spiked' i 2012. Den undersøger Davenports negative holdning til tatoveringer, hans brug af sprog og retoriske virkemidler som patos og etos. Opgaven diskuterer også tatoveringers udvikling fra subkultur til mainstream og elevens egen holdning til emnet.

Redaktørens vurdering
10 Fortrinlig
Solid analyse af en engelsk artikel med fokus på argumentation og retoriske virkemidler. Opgaven er velstruktureret og indeholder elevens egen perspektivering.
Struktur
10
Faglig dybde
10
Kilder
10
Fuldstændighed
10
  • argumentation
  • etos
  • individ
  • logos
  • mainstream
  • neil davenport
  • patos
  • retorik
  • spiked
  • tatoveringer

‘Why Tattoos make my flesh crawl’ is an article by Neil Davenport and was published in the British internet magazine ‘Spiked’ in 2012. In the beginning of the article, Davenport talks about Joanna Southgate, and how her heavily tattooed arms caused a stir at Royal Ascot, after she snuck in and avoided being told to cover them up. Throughout the article Davenport proceeds to discuss the different issues associated with the topic ‘tattoos’ and how it has become mainstream to the point, where it is almost rare to see someone without one.

2.

From the start, he makes his stance clear for example by saying: “acres and acres of flesh vandalized by grubby-looking ink daubings” (p. 1, l. 40). He thinks people “vandalize” their skin by covering it up with ink. Neil Davenport uses his language and argumentation to get his message across. He uses open argumentation, stating clearly and directly that he disagrees with those who see advantages in tattoos: “The tattoo has always been a mark of powerlessness, not individuality. And now everyone’s got one.” (p. 1, ll 1-2). In this sentence he uses the word ‘powerlessness’, which is a very negative and condescending word, and therefore the harsh tone is already set from the outset. Davenport also talks about how having a tattoo has become mainstream, and now everyone, from footballers to the prime minister’s wife, has their body adorned in artwork and claims that: “not having a tattoo is now a sign of daring rebellion” (p. 2, ll. 48-49)

Få adgang til denne og 100.000+ andre opgaver i PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Du har også set på

Lignende opgaver