Can social media have an effect on youths’ minds, especially boys? That has been a controversial topic in today’s society. In late modern society old norms, and traditions have a less role, especially with the development of social media. Youngsters in this generation of time, no longer pictures their families, as role models, rather they look up to random MRAs activists such as Andrew Tate. The Article “Adolescence reveals a terrifying truth; Smartphones are poison for boy’s minds”-written by Martha Gill, is a non-fiction text, and it’s written for various reasons, in which can be seen in the text, as it criticizes the effect of social media on young boys, and how it effects their minds.
The Article Is intended to raise awareness among parents and politicians, inviting them to reflect on the ever-growing problem of social media, and online radicalization. The Title in the article is the core for her statement, as she uses strong and emotive language “Smartphones are poison for boy’s minds” the use of “poison” shows that they are not only a distraction, but rather poison to young boys’ minds, and actively harmful. Her use of pronouns in the article is also fundamental, she uses the pronouns “we/us” to include the readers, and appeal to their emotions. For example, when she writes “it makes us look a little emotionally incontinent, as a country” (P.1, l.25), she creates a sense of shared responsibility and national concern. This strategy helps her build a connection with the audience, making them feel involved in the issue rather than passive observers.
Det er gratis at oprette en konto