1 / 3 sider - klik for at bladre

Analyse af reality-tv showet 'Boys and Girls Alone'

  • Engelsk
  • 1.g el. lign.
  • Afleveret til 10
  • 3 sider PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Analyse af reality-tv showet 'Boys and Girls Alone' er en engelsk-opgave til 1.g el. lign., afleveret til karakteren 10. Fylder 3 sider (1.027 ord, ca. 4 min. læsning) og blev publiceret 22. oktober 2010.

Denne opgave analyserer reality-tv showet 'Boys and Girls Alone' ud fra forskellige synspunkter, herunder programmets producent, en børneekspert og en forælder. Den diskuterer etiske dilemmaer ved at lade børn deltage i reality-tv, med fokus på børns velfærd og mediernes indflydelse. Opgaven perspektiverer til bredere konsekvenser af reality-tv for deltagere.

Redaktørens vurdering
10 Fortrinlig
Solid analyse af reality-tv showet 'Boys and Girls Alone' med forskellige perspektiver på børns velfærd og medieetik. Velskrevet og giver god inspiration.
Struktur
10
Faglig dybde
10
Kilder
10
Fuldstændighed
12
  • boys and girls alone
  • børns velfærd
  • forældreansvar
  • medieetik
  • mediepåvirkning
  • reality-tv
  • sociale eksperimenter
  • tv-programmer

In the text “Letters to the Editor” we are given answers to the show called “Boys and Girls Alone” by Head of Factual Entertainment, Andrew Mackenzie.

According to him, as a responsible broadcaster, he regards children’s welfare as his first priority. He’s saying that the program is a good way on how to make children make their own decisions about their lives in a safe environment. He can assure that all the children were carefully chosen and screened by experts. Throughout the whole stage parents and their children had the access to expert advice and support. The children lived under good circumstances and protected environment. Trained child chaperones were present throughout the whole program to insure no fighting or disarm between the children. Mackenzie is actually saying that the program was a great experience and the parents’ response has been very positive.

Now if we see the program through Dr Richard House eyes, we can see a huge difference between his and Andrew Mackenzie’s response to the program. Dr House is saying that the program is child cruelty and has no place in research or TV in that matter. In the previous letter from Andrew Mackenzie we heard that the children were guided throughout the whole program by experts etc. That’s not enough according to Dr House because no matter how “expert” they might be it’s impossible to ensure the safety of any environment. Shortly he’s just saying the program is no more than a grotesque social experiment conducted on child guinea-pigs.

Få adgang til denne og 100.000+ andre opgaver i PDF

Det er gratis at oprette en konto

Du har også set på

Lignende opgaver