I’ve been reading about Nike’s controversial campaign, and want to know why and what does Kaepernick so controversial, and have the consequences been worth it? Has this turned the picture into something positive, and why did Nike choose this campaign? Was it just to brand their name, even if their publicity is negative and boycotts?
First of all, why and what does Kaepernick so controversial and have the consequences been worth it? The article ‘Nike’s controversial Colin Kaepernick ad campaign its most divisive yet ‘ has focus on Nike’s campaign and Kaepernick’s controversial attitude about black and white, and why he wont show his pride over a country having recistical opinions. Kaepernick said: ‘’ I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of colour. To me this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder. ‘
His players started to support him. At the brands 30th anniversary, Kaepernick was made one of the faces of the ´just do it´ slogan. And it was played out on talk shows all over America. John Brennan supported Kaepernick and said that the athlete was a successful social justice campaigner, Brennan Wrote: ‘’ Colin Kaepernick drew our collective attention to the problem of continued racial injustice in America.”, and: ‘’ he did so not to disrespect our flag, but to give meaning to the words of the preamble of our constitution - ‘in order to form a more perfect union ‘, well done Colin.”
Det er gratis at oprette en konto