Etisk diskussion af 'Flowers for Algernon'

"Flowers for Algernon" suggests discussing whether it’s a duty of ethical action, and then it’s wrong to change the Identity of a human being, because there’s a reason that you are who you are. It’s wrong to change Charles Intelligence when Charlie doesn’t understand whats happening and can’t see the consequences by during this. He thinks that the Scientist do it for him, but they do it principle for their own sake and abusing Charlie’s trust. Charlie is in a mental state that he can’t tell the different between what’s right or wrong, in that case it’s wrong to exploit him. There are a lot of Pathos, when we get a lot sympathy for Charlie, and it’s written as a diary and in the same time they try to put ourselves in Charlie’s place. When there is a lot of miss-spelling in the text, we get a sense of how stupid Charlie is, and we also see that it’s wrong to exploit him.If it’s all right to go in and change Charlie in this way, where is the limit then? Ends this with that we can go in to change the Children brains, and make the perfect human being? There is a reason that we are and who we are, and we need a kind of everyone, and we shouldn’t go in and chance the balance in this society. If everybody gets smarter isn’t there anyone to be dustmen’s, and sit behind the dish, and to drive the bus. This is just a thought that Hitler had, about the perfect world and the perfect human and just see how it went.